Readability of My Blog

Well, I just stumbled across an article outlining how to tweak Google search in order to find out the readability of your blog.

Here are the steps:

  1. Go to (obviously!).
  2. Click on Advanced Search which is located to the right of the search input box.
  3. When the customization page opens, go down to where it says Reading Level. By default, it says “no reading level displayed”.
  4. Click on the drop down list and select: “annotate results with reading levels”
  5. Go further down, to where it says: “search within a site or a domain” and key in the domain of your blog (in my case
  6. Click on Advance Search.

Look how my blog fares:


Most publications geared towards blogging about scientific issues aims to bring it to the average lay person, who may not be comfortable with the jargon one often associates with “hard” science. The more the usage of jargon in a blog, the higher its reading level goes. This is somewhat similar to the Flesch-Kincaid Reading level metrics that are embedded in MS Word. Now, whilst this seems very intriguing on the surface, there are a lot of other considerations to be taken into the equation:

  1. With blogs, there is an element of interaction, and hence, that might falsely bring down the reading level to the intermediate standard. Whether this screens the comments section, I have no idea, but considering the fact that this is a global search on the said domain, I believe the comments are factored in.
  2. Whether or not the non-blog texts (like static pages, widgets, advertisements, runs of HTML etc.) are considered is not known. These, again, would serve as false noise, which would bring down the reading levels.
  3. In my blog, there are lots of non-science posts. Plenty of posts which are just runs of personal rants or bouts of link love being shared, which, for the most parts, have little to do with the scientific posts.

All said and done, I believe that these factors are but minor players. It may cause an error,  but not as large as to overshadow the general focus of a blog. With mine, an Intermediate rating is acceptable. In fact, I think that it is a good thing, because it means that unlike most doctors, I tend NOT to write big, jargon-ey words, and instead am able to communicate through colloquial, everyday language.

And science should be about simplifying the whole process. It is not good scientific communication if one uses too much jargon and “hard” words to explain “hard” science. So, take a look at the science posts in my blog (try the category of research blogging from the sidebar). Read them. Tell me what you think: do you think they merit the intermediate badge or am I yet another doc who is in love with big, heavy words”? And where does your blog stand in this measure?

Skeptic Oslerphile. PhD Student in the Department of International Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Past: 1) Public Health Scientist and Program Manager, Translational Global Health Policy Research Cell, Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2) Scientist, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases; 3) Senior Research Associate, Public Health Foundation of India. Interests include: Emerging Infections, Public Health, Antimicrobial Resistance, One Health and Zoonoses, Diarrheal Diseases, Medical Education, Medical History, Open Access, Healthcare Social Media and Health2.0. Opinions are my own!

17 comments on “Readability of My Blog

  1. Mine returned with no reading levels. What do you think that means?


  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Readability of My Blog | Scepticemia --

  3. itshaphazard

    mine turned out null as well lol


    • Again, I hope you did all the steps correct. Check out for some other site. If that works out, maybe its because Google is yet to index your site…


  4. Thanks for this tip, Dr. Skeptic—pretty cool! I ranked 50/50 basic/intermediate. I wonder what kind of sites rank as advanced….


  5. Pingback: Five-star Recruit Christian Westerman De-commits From Texas, Heads To Auburn – Dallas Morning News

  6. Pingback: Rafa Slam Still On Track; Clijsters Quashes Rumor – Charlotte Observer

  7. Pingback: Reassessing Readability of My Blog | Scepticemia

  8. mine was 89%basic, 11% intermediate


    • Mine has changed! More on the advanced front now! 🙂 Good to hear from you! Been ages!!!


    • sorry, i’ve been rather busy and/or sick. getting ready to move at the end of this month. I’m still subscribed to your blog and read your posts (though some of the medical stuff I don’t quite understand or relate to). how have you been?


    • Very busy. Did not keep up with the Blogger buddies for the last couple of months. Been reading all of your stuff on email, but just kinda swamped: will try to be more active leaving comments and stuff… this is really time taking though…

      I hope your sickness is getting all cleared up? 🙂


    • thanks…i go back to the doc tomorrow.


Debates and Discussions...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: