Forgive the hyperbolic title. Do not take offense and read on before hating on me. Please note the post script for added justification for this inflammatory title, if you so feel. Thanks. Now on with the main show!
Not the best known of neurologists, history has not been very kind to this amicable gentleman, who was, like many other physicians of his era, a very musically and artistically gifted person (1). His most significant contributions were in the field of the cerebral blood circulation which not only added volumes to the knowledge of the anatomy of the human body, but also furthered the study of Neurology as a discipline. He was, along with Alexander Kolisko, responsible for defining the anterior choroidal territory. (2)He is probably the most well known for the eponymous neurological sign which is characteristic for the presence of a lesion at the level of T10, but arguably, he had more significant contributions in the fields of cerebral localization and the blood supply of the brain. However, Beevor’s sign remains one of the most commonly used clinical tests to localize level of spinal trauma and his contributions in the other fields have become marginalized.
His interest in neurology can be traced back to his training under famed neurologists of the day like Wilhelm Heinrich Erb (of Erb’s point and Erb’s palsy fame!) and (neuro)pathologist Julius Cohnheim.
In 1898 he published a very definitive and authoritarian textbook on Neurology, titled Handbook on Diseases of the Nervous System.
The eponymous sign is one of the last vestiges of this great academic in clinical medicine. The description of the sign is pretty typical (3):
Here is a video on how to administer the test:
Here is a good example of what a positive test might look like from a real life case report (4):
Beevor’s sign is also described inter alia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and fascioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (3). It is said that in the diagnosis of FSHMD, which is the 3rd most common type of muscular dystrophy, it has a whopping 95% sensitivity and 93% specificity! (5,6)
No wonder this sign has kept his name alive!
Now to come to the final contribution that I wanted to highlight. In 1885 another “exotic” neurologic manifestation was first described by Beevor in the company of another neurologist, Armand de Watteville: the jaw jerk reflex. The ﬁrst patient was a woman with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who had an increased jaw jerk, which he demonstrated by introducing ‘a tongue depressor or paper knife in the mouth’ and striking ‘either object with a thin bound book or best of all with a percussion hammer’ (7). However, there is a lot of doubt over this matter, since Watteville had noted (without any references) that it was first elicited in a patient in America. Other researchers have unearthed the fact that the American Neurologist, Morris James Lewis, may have been the first person to have elicited this jerk. Although not a part of the standard clinical examination, the jaw jerk reflex, like most obscure things, held a very important place for us during our practical examinations. This rarely performed test was routinely asked to us by examiners…
This highly respected physician worked with the best and most well known researchers in his day. Born to a highly respected surgeon, his father was a fellow of Royal College of Surgeons, and trained by a multitude of celebrity teachers, he was destined to be one of the heroes of clinical medicine. Yet, time, has marched on and Beevor has been relegated to the realms of obscurity, remembered by clinical romantics like me who dig up the names and faces behind the clinical signs that intrigue them.
1. Brown GH: Lives of the Fellows of the Royal College of Physicians of London (1826–1925). London, Royal College of Physicians, 1984, vol 4, pp 325–326.
2. Beevor CE: Cerebral blood supply. Brain 1908; 30: 403–425.
3. Awerbuch GI, Nigro MA: Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Arch Neurol 1990; 47: 1208–1209.
4. David Hilton-Jones. Neurological Sign: Beevor’s SignPract Neurol 2004;4:176-177
5. Shahrizaila N, Wills AJ. Significance of Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and other neuromuscular diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:869–870.
6. Eger K, Jordan B, Habermann S, Zierz S. Beevor’s sign in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: an old sign with new implications. J Neurol. 2010;257:436-438.
7. Pearce, J. (2005). Beevor’s Sign European Neurology, 53 (4), 208-209 DOI: 10.1159/000086731
16 thoughts on “Charles Beevor: The Sign of a “Bloody” Jerk”
A favorite qustion of our examiners is “In which direction will you strike the hammer in jaw jerk?”
Two minor typos in 2nd para – mot->most, clinica ->clinical.
Thanks for pointing them out. Am running a bit high on the sleep debt. Cutting down on all social activities for studies still doesn’t leave much time for sleep. Add to that an unyielding keyboard, and I’m lucky that there were only 2 tiny typos! 😛
Anyways, I have never seen an actual jaw jerk. Have you?
Never seen one either 🙂
Oh well, that makes two of us. Oh, and by the way, just as a way of suggestion, why don’t you use your blog link (blogger allows OpenID) a your ID here when you comment instead of your FB page? I know I have fewer readers than you do, but maybe some of them will spill over?
You have way more readers than me Pranab da!!
For some reason the comment system automatically uses my FB account, will use the Blog link from now on.
LOL. Is it so? I won’t complain then! But even if it ain’t so, I think its better to override the comment system and use the Blogger OpenID! Simple tricks to grab more eyeballs!
Very well written!
I recently started following this blog. Got me hooked 🙂
Thanks for the kind words! And thanks especially for following the blog. 🙂
Your title caught my attention alright!! And the non-medico me (I am always tempted to say pseudo – medico ;>) – read the entire thing with interest! Learned something new today (the jaw jerk) 🙂 . And I really think that if you get lots of student medicos to learn stuff like this – it is a great teaching tool… catchy titles!!
Thanks for the kind words Ma’am. I am trying to challenge the entire premise that History of Medicine is a boring area. Personally speaking I have always been a bit of a history buff and I find the history of science more fascinating than anything else. It reminds me of the human touch that was the root of the discipline of medicine… and which is fast disappearing in the glare of a number of stifling circumstances…
At the great risk of you spending all your time here…. have you visited this?
The National Library of Medicine’s History of Medicine Section?
I love the images section of HMD, btw…
Yes I have. It is a fantastic resource, but sometimes in ALL the details, the fun is lost. Its very official and serious… 😛
So your job is to take something from those “official and serious” pages… write catchy titles and teach kids about these things by making them lighter! Who knows – one day the NLM may fund you for this!! Mere muh me ghee shakkar!
Nice read. Good share. I’m following.