Let me make it clear at the very outset that I am aware that AS is being indicted for hacking by the federal government on charges of “wire fraud, computer fraud”, etc and not for downloading too many journal articles off JSTOR (4.8 million, to be precise). Here is what the prosecution had to say:
In a statement announcing the charges, a United States attorney, Carmen M. Ortiz, said: “Stealing is stealing, whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data or dollars. It is equally harmful to the victim whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away.”
The case is getting credence despite the JSTOR reaching an agreement with Swartz on not pressing charges is mainly due to the methods he employed for getting access to the files. Not being a hack geek myself, I admit, that I do not know the details of the same but apparently, they seem to be less than legal to the circling lawyers.
I am trying to read up more on the affair but as of now, my sympathy is on the side of the inventor of RSS. What is your take on this matter?
1. Webb K. The difference between Google and Aaron Swartz. MediaFile Blog, Reuters. July 21, 2011. Available from: http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/07/20/the-difference-between-google-and-aaron-swartz/
2. Schwartz J. Open-Access advocate is arrested for huge download. The New York Times, July 19, 2011. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/20/us/20compute.html
Categories: Research Blogging